Publicación: Aporte de Galileo a la ciencia moderna.
Autor corporativo
Recolector de datos
Otros/Desconocido
Director audiovisual
Editor/Compilador
Editores
Universidad Católica de Pereira
Fecha
Cita bibliográfica
Título de serie/ reporte/ volumen/ colección
Es Parte de
Descripción general
En este escrito se intentan mostrar los elementos de la filosofía aristotélica que predeterminan la ciencia moderna. El planteamiento central gira en torno a la relación entre Caldeo y Platón y respalda una tesis que se pretende de la lectura de Koyré, y es la de pensar que entre el pensamiento antiguo y el pensamiento moderno (galileano) no hay ruptura, sino, por el contrario, continuidad. Tesis que algunos filósofos como Kuhn, por ejemplo, rechazan e incluso defienden el punto de vista contrario.
In this paper aristothelic philosophy elements are shown, those ones predetermine modern science. The main point turns around the relationship among Caldeo and Platon and it supports a thesis that is pretended from reading the text of Koyré, which is to think that among the ancient thought and the modern thought (galilean) there is no break, but, on the contrary, continuity. Thesis that some philosophers like Kuhn, for example, reject and even defend the opposite point of view.
In this paper aristothelic philosophy elements are shown, those ones predetermine modern science. The main point turns around the relationship among Caldeo and Platon and it supports a thesis that is pretended from reading the text of Koyré, which is to think that among the ancient thought and the modern thought (galilean) there is no break, but, on the contrary, continuity. Thesis that some philosophers like Kuhn, for example, reject and even defend the opposite point of view.